MW (Democratic Republic of Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1240
MW (Democratic Republic of Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1240 (Rix, Sullivan and Lewison LJJ)(28 October 2011):
24. I do not accept Mr. Hall’s submission that, notwithstanding Maslov, the Respondent may lawfully deport a settled migrant such as this Appellant even in the absence of any very serious reasons to justify deportation. Whether the reference to “very serious reasons” in paragraph 75 of Maslov is described as a “rule”, “test” or “threshold”, or simply as the inevitable consequence of the proper application of the Üner criteria to the case of a settled migrant who has spent all or the major part of his childhood and youth in the host country, Maslov does pull the threads together and in so doing makes it clear in paragraph 75 that very serious reasons are required to justify expulsion in such a case. In the absence of very serious reasons the deportation of a settled migrant will not be proportionate under Article 8.

Categories
- HUMAN RESOURCES & EMPLOYERS (10)
- INDIVIDUALS (18)
- INVESTORS & ENTREPRENEURS (8)
- LAWYERS (32)
Recent UK Immigration Judicial Decisions- MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 (18 May 2012) 18 May 2012
- R (on the application of SS)v London Borough of Croydon (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 139 (IAC) (16 May 2012) 16 May 2012
- R (on the application of ES) v London Borough of Hounslow (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 138 (IAC) (15 May 2012) 15 May 2012
- Mumu (paragraph 320; Article 8; scope) Bangladesh [2012] UKUT 143 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Ahmadi (s.47 decision: validity; Sapkota) Afghanistan [2012] UKUT 147 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012







